Moderation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* [[Mastodon/Mods On Call]] - on call schedule, currently inactive as we have a team that's able to handle things consistently, but could become active if mod burden increases/availability changes (-jonny, 23-10-29) | * [[Mastodon/Mods On Call]] - on call schedule, currently inactive as we have a team that's able to handle things consistently, but could become active if mod burden increases/availability changes (-jonny, 23-10-29) | ||
* [[Moderation API]] - bulk moderation actions | * [[Moderation API]] - bulk moderation actions | ||
== Resources == | |||
Starting a list of links for now, but we should likely split this off into a separate page to be more of a public resource. Will annotate as i go through these, but dont have time to read all right now <3 ''-jonny, 23-10-29'' | |||
'''Organizations:''' | |||
* [[IFTAS]] | |||
** https://mastodon.iftas.org/@iftas | |||
** https://about.iftas.org/ | |||
** https://github.com/iftas-org/rfcs - seems inactive? | |||
** https://github.com/iftas-org/resources | |||
'''Uncategorized:''' | |||
* From https://indieweb.social/@jdp23/111321208794907032 | |||
** [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.11250.pdf Towards Intersectional Moderation: An Alternative Model of Moderation Built on Care and Power] | |||
<blockquote> | |||
Justice models of moderation are concerned with repairing harms such as psychological distress, | |||
physical violence, oppression, marginalization, and threats to free expression. As Salehi [ 75] notes, | |||
framing online harms as a content moderation problem “assumes that the problem is individual | |||
pieces of content to be moderated—not people and their relationships.” In contrast, justice models | |||
focus on people and emphasis is placed on accountability and reparation to victims of online harms | |||
[ 75, 77]. For example, rather than top-down paternalistic models that can replicate the carceral | |||
logics described by Gray and Stein [ 36], justice-based models foster education, rehabilitation, and | |||
forgiveness. Sanctions would be proportionate to the violation, and decisions would account for | |||
context, focusing on behaviour rather than content. Justice models also foreground those who | |||
have been harmed to locate appropriate reparations [78, 79]. Finally, justice-based models move | |||
beyond “neutral” decision-making frameworks to frameworks that support communities making | |||
moderation decisions for themselves [75, 77]. | |||
</blockquote> | |||
* From https://blorbo.social/@azurelunatic/111321451009173943 | |||
** http://wiki.dreamwidth.net/wiki/index.php/IRC#Rules | |||
* From https://mastodon.social/@skry/111322171115086962 | |||
** https://books.slashdot.org/story/09/02/09/1441227/managing-online-forums | |||
** https://web.archive.org/web/20150312041630/http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2009/3/12/33338/3000 | |||
** https://www.anildash.com/2011/07/20/if_your_websites_full_of_assholes_its_your_fault-2/ | |||
** https://jaygraber.medium.com/designing-decentralized-moderation-a76430a8eab | |||
** https://web.archive.org/web/20210303150922/https://buildwithrespect.com/2019/11/16/pants-problems/ | |||
** https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.13500 | |||
** https://tsjournal.org/index.php/jots | |||
== See Also == | == See Also == | ||
Latest revision as of 01:22, 30 October 2023
Up to Mastodon, Mastodon/Social WG
Moderation is coordinated by the Social WG.
Policies
- Code of Conduct - moderation for instance members
- Federation Abuse Policy - moderation for other instances
Moderating
- Mod Guide - help us write this! :)
- Defederated Instances
- Mastodon/Mods On Call - on call schedule, currently inactive as we have a team that's able to handle things consistently, but could become active if mod burden increases/availability changes (-jonny, 23-10-29)
- Moderation API - bulk moderation actions
Resources
Starting a list of links for now, but we should likely split this off into a separate page to be more of a public resource. Will annotate as i go through these, but dont have time to read all right now <3 -jonny, 23-10-29
Organizations:
Uncategorized:
Justice models of moderation are concerned with repairing harms such as psychological distress, physical violence, oppression, marginalization, and threats to free expression. As Salehi [ 75] notes, framing online harms as a content moderation problem “assumes that the problem is individual pieces of content to be moderated—not people and their relationships.” In contrast, justice models focus on people and emphasis is placed on accountability and reparation to victims of online harms [ 75, 77]. For example, rather than top-down paternalistic models that can replicate the carceral logics described by Gray and Stein [ 36], justice-based models foster education, rehabilitation, and forgiveness. Sanctions would be proportionate to the violation, and decisions would account for context, focusing on behaviour rather than content. Justice models also foreground those who have been harmed to locate appropriate reparations [78, 79]. Finally, justice-based models move beyond “neutral” decision-making frameworks to frameworks that support communities making moderation decisions for themselves [75, 77].
- From https://blorbo.social/@azurelunatic/111321451009173943
- From https://mastodon.social/@skry/111322171115086962
- https://books.slashdot.org/story/09/02/09/1441227/managing-online-forums
- https://web.archive.org/web/20150312041630/http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2009/3/12/33338/3000
- https://www.anildash.com/2011/07/20/if_your_websites_full_of_assholes_its_your_fault-2/
- https://jaygraber.medium.com/designing-decentralized-moderation-a76430a8eab
- https://web.archive.org/web/20210303150922/https://buildwithrespect.com/2019/11/16/pants-problems/
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.13500
- https://tsjournal.org/index.php/jots