Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "Contains text" with value "i think it would be cool if we could pay a member or two to hack on the instance!! we could take proposals on what ppl would like to see improved that guide what they are working on so we actually can resolve some of the many tiny things littering our [[Mastodon/TODO]] and maybe even one or two big things like finally doing [[DIY Algorithms]] or [[Nested Threads]] or whatnot. [[Grants]] [[Mastodon/Grants]]". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 53 results starting with #1.

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

  • Discord Messages#mannaz-23-07-07 18:47:50  + ([[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-07-07]]: masto 4.1.[[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-07-07]]: masto 4.1.3 update -- security patch. Jonny's on the road so Lina and Manisha are going to give this a try. If we muck something up, please be kind 🥺 starting by making a linode backup and then following instructions on ... </br></br>oh wait! dang they already released 4.1.4 just an hour ago </br>https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/releases/tag/v4.1.4 </br></br>4.1.3 from yesterday: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/releases/tag/v4.1.3.com/mastodon/mastodon/releases/tag/v4.1.3)
  • Discord Messages#mannaz-23-07-10 00:35:37  + ([[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-07-09]]: Updating r[[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-07-09]]: Updating reverse proxy config to the recommended one</br>as root</br>`cd /etc/nginx</br>cd site-enabled</br>vim mastodon`</br></br>search for "system"</br>added the following two headers in that block as per the release notes:</br>`add_header X-Content-Type-Options nosniff;</br> add_header Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'none'; form-action 'none'"; `</br></br>save</br>test nginx configs are valid or not (w/o running)</br>`nginx -t `</br></br>all looked good</br>`nginx: the configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf syntax is ok</br>nginx: configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf test is successful</br>`</br>Reload nginxinx.conf test is successful ` Reload nginx)
  • Tech WG/Ops Diary#sneakers.the.rat-23-09-20 02:55:44  + ([[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-09-19]] - Upgrading[[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-09-19]] - Upgrading to 4.2-RC2 while trying to write the [[Upgrade Mastodon]] docs. currently doing the merge from upstream and noticing db migrations for exclusive lists failing, but not fixing now because that would put the fixes in the `glitch-soc-main` branch which is a local mirror of upstream which gets force pushed. Seems like that should happen in the `merge-upstream` branch after upstream is merged-upstream` branch after upstream is merged)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-23-09-20 02:55:44  + ([[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-09-19]] - Upgrading[[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-09-19]] - Upgrading to 4.2-RC2 while trying to write the [[Upgrade Mastodon]] docs. currently doing the merge from upstream and noticing db migrations for exclusive lists failing, but not fixing now because that would put the fixes in the `glitch-soc-main` branch which is a local mirror of upstream which gets force pushed. Seems like that should happen in the `merge-upstream` branch after upstream is merged-upstream` branch after upstream is merged)
  • Tech WG/Ops Diary#mannazsci-23-10-01 07:44:40  + ([[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-10-01]] I am ready to deploy v4.2 but I encountered a few issues while following the process mentioned in [[Upgrade_Mastodon]]. I'll update the wiki with the steps I took.)
  • Discord Messages#mannazsci-23-10-01 07:44:40  + ([[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-10-01]] I am ready to deploy v4.2 but I encountered a few issues while following the process mentioned in [[Upgrade_Mastodon]]. I'll update the wiki with the steps I took.)
  • Upgrade Mastodon#mannazsci-23-10-01 07:44:40  + ([[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-10-01]] I am ready[[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-10-01]] I am ready to deploy v4.2 but I encountered a few issues while following the process mentioned in [[Upgrade_Mastodon]]. The glitch-soc-main branch had commits from merge-upstream even after syncing the the branch. So I created a new branch called glitch-clean-sync from glitch-soc's main branch and added protections to this branch. This let's us keep this branch clean and not merge any custom features to this branch. We'd only use the sync feature. I also tried to follow the rest of the process but it seemed a bit complicated/unclear. I've tried to simplify it in a separate section above for glitch+4.2+our instance's features. I've also created a clean and stable dev-stable branch for custom features that we add. I've added branch protections here as well and PRs will require reviews on this branch.d PRs will require reviews on this branch.)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-09 12:38:45  + ([[Wiki#TODO]] Clean up link to [[Wiki/TODO]] and write some docs on [[Wikibot#Usage Patterns]])
  • Wiki/TODO#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-09 12:38:45  + ([[Wiki#TODO]] Clean up link to [[Wiki/TODO]] and write some docs on [[Wikibot#Usage Patterns]])
  • Wikibot#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-09 12:38:45  + ([[Wiki#TODO]] Clean up link to [[Wiki/TODO]] and write some docs on [[Wikibot#Usage Patterns]])
  • Wiki#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-09 12:38:45  + ([[Wiki#TODO]] Clean up link to [[Wiki/TODO]] and write some docs on [[Wikibot#Usage Patterns]])
  • Institutional Memory#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-09 12:10:47  + (as u talk about stuff you can tag in varioas u talk about stuff you can tag in various concepts like [[Institutional Memory]] or if your working group is organized you can even tag in specific projects and Todo lists or just use it to bookmark conversations so you have an indexical/plastic memorybank alongside a fluid/streamlike mode of communication. the cscw ppl in the workshop we did a month or so ago went bananas for this lol it is goodo ago went bananas for this lol it is good)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-09 12:10:47  + (as u talk about stuff you can tag in varioas u talk about stuff you can tag in various concepts like [[Institutional Memory]] or if your working group is organized you can even tag in specific projects and Todo lists or just use it to bookmark conversations so you have an indexical/plastic memorybank alongside a fluid/streamlike mode of communication. the cscw ppl in the workshop we did a month or so ago went bananas for this lol it is goodo ago went bananas for this lol it is good)
  • Trends#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-15 03:31:15  + (i can't remember where we left off w.r.t. enabling [[trends]] on the instance, i can't think of a strong reason to leave them disabled, but does anyone have feelings about this?)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-15 03:31:15  + (i can't remember where we left off w.r.t. enabling [[trends]] on the instance, i can't think of a strong reason to leave them disabled, but does anyone have feelings about this?)
  • Mastodon/Grants#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-07 04:15:02  +
  • DIY Algorithms#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-07 04:15:02  +
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-07 04:15:02  +
  • Mastodon/TODO#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-07 04:15:02  +
  • Nested Threads#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-07 04:15:02  +
  • Grants#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-07 04:15:02  +
  • Better Code Blocks#sneakers-the-rat-23-03-30 04:49:04  + (ok [[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-03-29]]ok [[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-03-29]]: going to pull in dev branch and deploy to tha server: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/pull/13</br></br> I thought this had fetch all replies in it but i need to rebase it and also now that we know how to write them i want to write some tests....</br>It does have [[Better Code Blocks]] in it from <@485848481995423755> : https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/pull/9</br></br>wish e luckm/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/pull/9 wish e luck)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-23-03-30 04:49:04  + (ok [[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-03-29]]ok [[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-03-29]]: going to pull in dev branch and deploy to tha server: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/pull/13</br></br> I thought this had fetch all replies in it but i need to rebase it and also now that we know how to write them i want to write some tests....</br>It does have [[Better Code Blocks]] in it from <@485848481995423755> : https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/pull/9</br></br>wish e luckm/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/pull/9 wish e luck)
  • Tech WG/Ops Diary#sneakers-the-rat-23-03-30 04:49:04  + (ok [[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-03-29]]ok [[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-03-29]]: going to pull in dev branch and deploy to tha server: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/pull/13</br></br> I thought this had fetch all replies in it but i need to rebase it and also now that we know how to write them i want to write some tests....</br>It does have [[Better Code Blocks]] in it from <@485848481995423755> : https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/pull/9</br></br>wish e luckm/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/pull/9 wish e luck)
  • WikiBot#sneakers-the-rat-23-05-20 08:29:54  + (ok [[Tech_WG/Ops_Diary#23-05-19]]ok [[Tech_WG/Ops_Diary#23-05-19]]: We conclude this evening having gotten all the way to the last stage where we pull back to main and then deploy. see preceding chat logs for history and also for the millionth time [[WikiBot#TODO]] implement archiving ranges of posts[[WikiBot#TODO]] implement archiving ranges of posts)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-23-05-20 08:29:54  + (ok [[Tech_WG/Ops_Diary#23-05-19]]ok [[Tech_WG/Ops_Diary#23-05-19]]: We conclude this evening having gotten all the way to the last stage where we pull back to main and then deploy. see preceding chat logs for history and also for the millionth time [[WikiBot#TODO]] implement archiving ranges of posts[[WikiBot#TODO]] implement archiving ranges of posts)
  • Tech WG/Ops Diary#sneakers-the-rat-23-05-20 08:29:54  + (ok [[Tech_WG/Ops_Diary#23-05-19]]ok [[Tech_WG/Ops_Diary#23-05-19]]: We conclude this evening having gotten all the way to the last stage where we pull back to main and then deploy. see preceding chat logs for history and also for the millionth time [[WikiBot#TODO]] implement archiving ranges of posts[[WikiBot#TODO]] implement archiving ranges of posts)
  • Hacks#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-17 10:58:31  + (ok i'd like to raise an olde idea again anok i'd like to raise an olde idea again and that is having an instancewide [[Sticky Posts]] to supplement announcements to be able to make discussions that are intended to lead to a proposal more visible to the instance. loomio and discord merely by virtue of being separate platforms are less visible, so let's try and do a lil bridging of mediums.</br></br>here's one idea of what that might look like:</br>v1</br>- currently we have a [[Discussions]] stage in governance docs (https://wiki.neuromatch.social/Governance#Discussions) we can make that a more formal definition and say that a discussion intended to lead to a proposal is a stickied post.</br>- ping a member of social wg (make sure these are up to date) or start discussion here to make a sticky post</br>- sticky posts come from an autofollowed @ discussions account</br>- ... are local only posts</br>- ... show themselves at the top of the home and local feed with a highlighted background color to offset them from the feed</br>- ... have a "minimize" button that is persistent across sessions, so once you minimize a sticky post it is hidden but still visible, I'm thinking like a 1em bar across the top of the feed</br></br>questions: </br>- can we just use browser storage to remember collapsed status rather than needing to make a new column in the statuses table for 'collapsed'</br>- should stickies have a time limit? or just a mechanism to close them in governance process?</br></br>v2</br>a) The threading interface on the web interface is awful, </br>b) it would be nice to be able to show a title on a minimized sticky post</br>c) ideally we would be able to organize discussions around topics and questions rather than chronologically in a more forumlike way</br>so</br>- posts can have titles</br>- titles are declared with a special "title" field in the web ui</br>- or with a first line beginning with a # from other clients, a la markdown</br>- replies with titles can be minimized too</br>- replies with titles are sorted first (bc they can be minimized)</br></br>[[Hacks]][[Hacks]])
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-17 10:58:31  + (ok i'd like to raise an olde idea again anok i'd like to raise an olde idea again and that is having an instancewide [[Sticky Posts]] to supplement announcements to be able to make discussions that are intended to lead to a proposal more visible to the instance. loomio and discord merely by virtue of being separate platforms are less visible, so let's try and do a lil bridging of mediums.</br></br>here's one idea of what that might look like:</br>v1</br>- currently we have a [[Discussions]] stage in governance docs (https://wiki.neuromatch.social/Governance#Discussions) we can make that a more formal definition and say that a discussion intended to lead to a proposal is a stickied post.</br>- ping a member of social wg (make sure these are up to date) or start discussion here to make a sticky post</br>- sticky posts come from an autofollowed @ discussions account</br>- ... are local only posts</br>- ... show themselves at the top of the home and local feed with a highlighted background color to offset them from the feed</br>- ... have a "minimize" button that is persistent across sessions, so once you minimize a sticky post it is hidden but still visible, I'm thinking like a 1em bar across the top of the feed</br></br>questions: </br>- can we just use browser storage to remember collapsed status rather than needing to make a new column in the statuses table for 'collapsed'</br>- should stickies have a time limit? or just a mechanism to close them in governance process?</br></br>v2</br>a) The threading interface on the web interface is awful, </br>b) it would be nice to be able to show a title on a minimized sticky post</br>c) ideally we would be able to organize discussions around topics and questions rather than chronologically in a more forumlike way</br>so</br>- posts can have titles</br>- titles are declared with a special "title" field in the web ui</br>- or with a first line beginning with a # from other clients, a la markdown</br>- replies with titles can be minimized too</br>- replies with titles are sorted first (bc they can be minimized)</br></br>[[Hacks]][[Hacks]])
  • Discussions#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-17 10:58:31  + (ok i'd like to raise an olde idea again anok i'd like to raise an olde idea again and that is having an instancewide [[Sticky Posts]] to supplement announcements to be able to make discussions that are intended to lead to a proposal more visible to the instance. loomio and discord merely by virtue of being separate platforms are less visible, so let's try and do a lil bridging of mediums.</br></br>here's one idea of what that might look like:</br>v1</br>- currently we have a [[Discussions]] stage in governance docs (https://wiki.neuromatch.social/Governance#Discussions) we can make that a more formal definition and say that a discussion intended to lead to a proposal is a stickied post.</br>- ping a member of social wg (make sure these are up to date) or start discussion here to make a sticky post</br>- sticky posts come from an autofollowed @ discussions account</br>- ... are local only posts</br>- ... show themselves at the top of the home and local feed with a highlighted background color to offset them from the feed</br>- ... have a "minimize" button that is persistent across sessions, so once you minimize a sticky post it is hidden but still visible, I'm thinking like a 1em bar across the top of the feed</br></br>questions: </br>- can we just use browser storage to remember collapsed status rather than needing to make a new column in the statuses table for 'collapsed'</br>- should stickies have a time limit? or just a mechanism to close them in governance process?</br></br>v2</br>a) The threading interface on the web interface is awful, </br>b) it would be nice to be able to show a title on a minimized sticky post</br>c) ideally we would be able to organize discussions around topics and questions rather than chronologically in a more forumlike way</br>so</br>- posts can have titles</br>- titles are declared with a special "title" field in the web ui</br>- or with a first line beginning with a # from other clients, a la markdown</br>- replies with titles can be minimized too</br>- replies with titles are sorted first (bc they can be minimized)</br></br>[[Hacks]][[Hacks]])
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-24-02-16 23:01:41  + (ok so they refactored all the css, and it ok so they refactored all the css, and it was pretty hard to track down what in the heck was changed, so here is another [[Lessons We Gone And Learned From Maintaining A Fork Of A Fork]] - patching is good, editing in place can be fragile. i moved the custom styles from better code blocks and expanded status previews to their own set of stub scss files that then get imported at the end of the scss index, so they should override conflicting rules set previously. that keeps them nice and separate and survivable in the case of big refactorings. this is similar to the "flavours" system which takes whatever isn't overridden from base masto. i can't run the dev server rn bc my brother is in town but since these are just css changes we can uh test in prod i think</br>https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/commit/8e54a6bf891ff855104225032dd9ccfb0163aceat/8e54a6bf891ff855104225032dd9ccfb0163acea)
  • Lessons We Gone And Learned From Maintaining A Fork Of A Fork#sneakers.the.rat-24-02-16 23:01:41  + (ok so they refactored all the css, and it ok so they refactored all the css, and it was pretty hard to track down what in the heck was changed, so here is another [[Lessons We Gone And Learned From Maintaining A Fork Of A Fork]] - patching is good, editing in place can be fragile. i moved the custom styles from better code blocks and expanded status previews to their own set of stub scss files that then get imported at the end of the scss index, so they should override conflicting rules set previously. that keeps them nice and separate and survivable in the case of big refactorings. this is similar to the "flavours" system which takes whatever isn't overridden from base masto. i can't run the dev server rn bc my brother is in town but since these are just css changes we can uh test in prod i think</br>https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/commit/8e54a6bf891ff855104225032dd9ccfb0163aceat/8e54a6bf891ff855104225032dd9ccfb0163acea)
  • Linode/Loomio#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-09 02:48:18  + (quick aside for <@540104559079456770>quick aside for <@540104559079456770> if she gets a second, can u add some DNS records for meeeee???</br>- `A` record pointing `feeds` subdomain to `45.56.100.144`</br>- `A` record pointing `dev.feeds` subdomain to `45.56.100.144`</br>- `AAAA` pointing `feeds` subdomain to `2600:3c03::f03c:93ff:feca:b20f` </br>- `AAAA` pointing `dev.feeds` subdomain to `2600:3c03::f03c:93ff:feca:b20f`</br></br>That's the [[Linode/Loomio]] node, not the [[Linode/Mastodon]] node, so i won't be draining resources. want to start running a dev version of [[paper-feeds]] to test against actual RSS readers and also test federation when we get to activitypub. https://github.com/sneakers-the-rat/paper-feeds/https://github.com/sneakers-the-rat/paper-feeds/)
  • Linode/Mastodon#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-09 02:48:18  + (quick aside for <@540104559079456770>quick aside for <@540104559079456770> if she gets a second, can u add some DNS records for meeeee???</br>- `A` record pointing `feeds` subdomain to `45.56.100.144`</br>- `A` record pointing `dev.feeds` subdomain to `45.56.100.144`</br>- `AAAA` pointing `feeds` subdomain to `2600:3c03::f03c:93ff:feca:b20f` </br>- `AAAA` pointing `dev.feeds` subdomain to `2600:3c03::f03c:93ff:feca:b20f`</br></br>That's the [[Linode/Loomio]] node, not the [[Linode/Mastodon]] node, so i won't be draining resources. want to start running a dev version of [[paper-feeds]] to test against actual RSS readers and also test federation when we get to activitypub. https://github.com/sneakers-the-rat/paper-feeds/https://github.com/sneakers-the-rat/paper-feeds/)
  • Paper-feeds#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-09 02:48:18  + (quick aside for <@540104559079456770>quick aside for <@540104559079456770> if she gets a second, can u add some DNS records for meeeee???</br>- `A` record pointing `feeds` subdomain to `45.56.100.144`</br>- `A` record pointing `dev.feeds` subdomain to `45.56.100.144`</br>- `AAAA` pointing `feeds` subdomain to `2600:3c03::f03c:93ff:feca:b20f` </br>- `AAAA` pointing `dev.feeds` subdomain to `2600:3c03::f03c:93ff:feca:b20f`</br></br>That's the [[Linode/Loomio]] node, not the [[Linode/Mastodon]] node, so i won't be draining resources. want to start running a dev version of [[paper-feeds]] to test against actual RSS readers and also test federation when we get to activitypub. https://github.com/sneakers-the-rat/paper-feeds/https://github.com/sneakers-the-rat/paper-feeds/)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-09 02:48:18  + (quick aside for <@540104559079456770>quick aside for <@540104559079456770> if she gets a second, can u add some DNS records for meeeee???</br>- `A` record pointing `feeds` subdomain to `45.56.100.144`</br>- `A` record pointing `dev.feeds` subdomain to `45.56.100.144`</br>- `AAAA` pointing `feeds` subdomain to `2600:3c03::f03c:93ff:feca:b20f` </br>- `AAAA` pointing `dev.feeds` subdomain to `2600:3c03::f03c:93ff:feca:b20f`</br></br>That's the [[Linode/Loomio]] node, not the [[Linode/Mastodon]] node, so i won't be draining resources. want to start running a dev version of [[paper-feeds]] to test against actual RSS readers and also test federation when we get to activitypub. https://github.com/sneakers-the-rat/paper-feeds/https://github.com/sneakers-the-rat/paper-feeds/)
  • WikiBot Checkup#sneakers-the-rat-23-04-27 04:17:50  + (sidenote I just looked at the channel member list and holy crap wikibot are you still alive [[WikiBot Checkup]])
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-23-04-27 04:17:50  + (sidenote I just looked at the channel member list and holy crap wikibot are you still alive [[WikiBot Checkup]])
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-09 04:53:38  + (so re: [[Stoplight]]so re: [[Stoplight]] and [[Cooldown]]s, [[Sidekiq#Cooldown]] tries to deliver something 16 times ( https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/eb24c0ad07c4137517e6bd37ebcc99d6e2b86797/app/workers/activitypub/delivery_worker.rb#L11 )</br>the delay rises exponentially (^4) with each retry. So eg by the 10th retry we're delaying an average of 208 minutes, and by 16 we're at 1365 (22 hours). </br></br>That delay uses sidekiq's `sidekiq_retry_in` method, which applies to each delivery task (ie. each status we're trying to push), but there is also an additional control flow tool Stoplight ( https://blog.bolshakov.dev/stoplight/ ) that applies per inbox URL (rather than per job). You start in a good (green) state. Each failure counts towards a threshold (10), after which it halts all jobs matching that inbox (red). After the cooldown period (60 seconds) it flips into a "yellow" state: if the next job succeeds, it flips back to green. If it fails, it goes immediately back to red. </br></br>That configuration seems sorta... pointless to me? if it only kicks in after 10 failures, then it'll only be halting after really long delays, right? it seems like that should be a high threshold with like a really long cooldown to me - if we haven't been able to deliver like 200 messages, then cooldown for like 6 hours (i'm not sure if receiving a message clears the stoplight) receiving a message clears the stoplight))
  • Stoplight#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-09 04:53:38  + (so re: [[Stoplight]]so re: [[Stoplight]] and [[Cooldown]]s, [[Sidekiq#Cooldown]] tries to deliver something 16 times ( https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/eb24c0ad07c4137517e6bd37ebcc99d6e2b86797/app/workers/activitypub/delivery_worker.rb#L11 )</br>the delay rises exponentially (^4) with each retry. So eg by the 10th retry we're delaying an average of 208 minutes, and by 16 we're at 1365 (22 hours). </br></br>That delay uses sidekiq's `sidekiq_retry_in` method, which applies to each delivery task (ie. each status we're trying to push), but there is also an additional control flow tool Stoplight ( https://blog.bolshakov.dev/stoplight/ ) that applies per inbox URL (rather than per job). You start in a good (green) state. Each failure counts towards a threshold (10), after which it halts all jobs matching that inbox (red). After the cooldown period (60 seconds) it flips into a "yellow" state: if the next job succeeds, it flips back to green. If it fails, it goes immediately back to red. </br></br>That configuration seems sorta... pointless to me? if it only kicks in after 10 failures, then it'll only be halting after really long delays, right? it seems like that should be a high threshold with like a really long cooldown to me - if we haven't been able to deliver like 200 messages, then cooldown for like 6 hours (i'm not sure if receiving a message clears the stoplight) receiving a message clears the stoplight))
  • Cooldown#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-09 04:53:38  + (so re: [[Stoplight]]so re: [[Stoplight]] and [[Cooldown]]s, [[Sidekiq#Cooldown]] tries to deliver something 16 times ( https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/eb24c0ad07c4137517e6bd37ebcc99d6e2b86797/app/workers/activitypub/delivery_worker.rb#L11 )</br>the delay rises exponentially (^4) with each retry. So eg by the 10th retry we're delaying an average of 208 minutes, and by 16 we're at 1365 (22 hours). </br></br>That delay uses sidekiq's `sidekiq_retry_in` method, which applies to each delivery task (ie. each status we're trying to push), but there is also an additional control flow tool Stoplight ( https://blog.bolshakov.dev/stoplight/ ) that applies per inbox URL (rather than per job). You start in a good (green) state. Each failure counts towards a threshold (10), after which it halts all jobs matching that inbox (red). After the cooldown period (60 seconds) it flips into a "yellow" state: if the next job succeeds, it flips back to green. If it fails, it goes immediately back to red. </br></br>That configuration seems sorta... pointless to me? if it only kicks in after 10 failures, then it'll only be halting after really long delays, right? it seems like that should be a high threshold with like a really long cooldown to me - if we haven't been able to deliver like 200 messages, then cooldown for like 6 hours (i'm not sure if receiving a message clears the stoplight) receiving a message clears the stoplight))
  • Sidekiq#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-09 04:53:38  + (so re: [[Stoplight]]so re: [[Stoplight]] and [[Cooldown]]s, [[Sidekiq#Cooldown]] tries to deliver something 16 times ( https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/eb24c0ad07c4137517e6bd37ebcc99d6e2b86797/app/workers/activitypub/delivery_worker.rb#L11 )</br>the delay rises exponentially (^4) with each retry. So eg by the 10th retry we're delaying an average of 208 minutes, and by 16 we're at 1365 (22 hours). </br></br>That delay uses sidekiq's `sidekiq_retry_in` method, which applies to each delivery task (ie. each status we're trying to push), but there is also an additional control flow tool Stoplight ( https://blog.bolshakov.dev/stoplight/ ) that applies per inbox URL (rather than per job). You start in a good (green) state. Each failure counts towards a threshold (10), after which it halts all jobs matching that inbox (red). After the cooldown period (60 seconds) it flips into a "yellow" state: if the next job succeeds, it flips back to green. If it fails, it goes immediately back to red. </br></br>That configuration seems sorta... pointless to me? if it only kicks in after 10 failures, then it'll only be halting after really long delays, right? it seems like that should be a high threshold with like a really long cooldown to me - if we haven't been able to deliver like 200 messages, then cooldown for like 6 hours (i'm not sure if receiving a message clears the stoplight) receiving a message clears the stoplight))
  • Mastodon/Feeds#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-21 17:49:16  + (so! the "local" feed is the one that showsso! the "local" feed is the one that shows all the toots from our instance, the "federated" feed shows all toots from everyone that everyone on the instance follow. "local-only toots" are a special feature of glitch-soc where you can make your post *only* visible to the other members of the instance (in base masto you can only limit to mentioned accounts or followers). Local feed also will show you boosts from people on our instance, I'm not sure if there's a way to turn that off but if there isn't there should be bc that would be nice</br></br>[[Mastodon/Social WG#TODO]]: guides on how the different [[Mastodon/Feeds]] and [[Mastodon/Post Visibility]] work[[Mastodon/Post Visibility]] work)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-21 17:49:16  + (so! the "local" feed is the one that showsso! the "local" feed is the one that shows all the toots from our instance, the "federated" feed shows all toots from everyone that everyone on the instance follow. "local-only toots" are a special feature of glitch-soc where you can make your post *only* visible to the other members of the instance (in base masto you can only limit to mentioned accounts or followers). Local feed also will show you boosts from people on our instance, I'm not sure if there's a way to turn that off but if there isn't there should be bc that would be nice</br></br>[[Mastodon/Social WG#TODO]]: guides on how the different [[Mastodon/Feeds]] and [[Mastodon/Post Visibility]] work[[Mastodon/Post Visibility]] work)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-12 12:03:08  + (this week is a good week to finish our rulthis week is a good week to finish our rules, instance description, invite statement and make a mass coordinated announcement ♥️♥️♥️😘😘😘</br>in cooperation, towards information liberation!!!!!</br></br>pls join us in conversations in <#1050561894752198706> if you are so inclined 🙂</br></br>[[Mastodon/Seed Council#TODO]]</br></br>https://open.spotify.com/track/0fEasSvs63eKApKfYbi2uDTODO]] https://open.spotify.com/track/0fEasSvs63eKApKfYbi2uD)
  • Mastodon/Seed Council#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-12 12:03:08  + (this week is a good week to finish our rulthis week is a good week to finish our rules, instance description, invite statement and make a mass coordinated announcement ♥️♥️♥️😘😘😘</br>in cooperation, towards information liberation!!!!!</br></br>pls join us in conversations in <#1050561894752198706> if you are so inclined 🙂</br></br>[[Mastodon/Seed Council#TODO]]</br></br>https://open.spotify.com/track/0fEasSvs63eKApKfYbi2uDTODO]] https://open.spotify.com/track/0fEasSvs63eKApKfYbi2uD)
  • Camel Case#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-29 00:27:20  + (we've talked about this as well, being ablwe've talked about this as well, being able to make the bot more granularly opt-in, as well as make some simple degeneracy rules like #CamelCase == [[Camel Case]] (actually proposed that probably to no result in masto here: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/19992#issuecomment-1363496984 )don/issues/19992#issuecomment-1363496984 ))
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-29 00:27:20  + (we've talked about this as well, being ablwe've talked about this as well, being able to make the bot more granularly opt-in, as well as make some simple degeneracy rules like #CamelCase == [[Camel Case]] (actually proposed that probably to no result in masto here: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/19992#issuecomment-1363496984 )don/issues/19992#issuecomment-1363496984 ))
  • Mastodon updates#mannaz-23-07-04 20:31:28  + (worst case scenario -- ppl get a break from scrolling our local TL for a while 😂 🙈 writing here in caps so that we [[Mastodon updates]] REMEMBER TO TAKE A BACKUP BEFORE starting.. we should have a rocess of the typical steps to follow)
  • Discord Messages#mannaz-23-07-04 20:31:28  + (worst case scenario -- ppl get a break from scrolling our local TL for a while 😂 🙈 writing here in caps so that we [[Mastodon updates]] REMEMBER TO TAKE A BACKUP BEFORE starting.. we should have a rocess of the typical steps to follow)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-23-07-04 21:16:38  + (yes agreed we should make a wiki guide to yes agreed we should make a wiki guide to updating the instance. </br></br>I need to log off for the day bc am visiting friends, but in short it's</br>- start backup in linode (reminder to also set you up with an account there and add that to [[Tech WG#TODO]] [[Tech WG/Onboarding]] docs</br>- do all the git work that we're familiar with to prepare the new deploy</br>- check upgrade notes, usually on base masto release notes, to see if anything out of the ordinary is required</br>- pull down new changes to server</br>- potentially recompile yarn assets</br>- potentially run database migrations</br>- restart mastodon-* services</br></br>and that's usually it. downtime is usually on the order of a few seconds (and we could explore how to make that zero, I think that's how the pros do it with like multiple servers)the pros do it with like multiple servers))
  • Tech WG/Onboarding#sneakers.the.rat-23-07-04 21:16:38  + (yes agreed we should make a wiki guide to yes agreed we should make a wiki guide to updating the instance. </br></br>I need to log off for the day bc am visiting friends, but in short it's</br>- start backup in linode (reminder to also set you up with an account there and add that to [[Tech WG#TODO]] [[Tech WG/Onboarding]] docs</br>- do all the git work that we're familiar with to prepare the new deploy</br>- check upgrade notes, usually on base masto release notes, to see if anything out of the ordinary is required</br>- pull down new changes to server</br>- potentially recompile yarn assets</br>- potentially run database migrations</br>- restart mastodon-* services</br></br>and that's usually it. downtime is usually on the order of a few seconds (and we could explore how to make that zero, I think that's how the pros do it with like multiple servers)the pros do it with like multiple servers))
  • Tech WG#sneakers.the.rat-23-07-04 21:16:38  + (yes agreed we should make a wiki guide to yes agreed we should make a wiki guide to updating the instance. </br></br>I need to log off for the day bc am visiting friends, but in short it's</br>- start backup in linode (reminder to also set you up with an account there and add that to [[Tech WG#TODO]] [[Tech WG/Onboarding]] docs</br>- do all the git work that we're familiar with to prepare the new deploy</br>- check upgrade notes, usually on base masto release notes, to see if anything out of the ordinary is required</br>- pull down new changes to server</br>- potentially recompile yarn assets</br>- potentially run database migrations</br>- restart mastodon-* services</br></br>and that's usually it. downtime is usually on the order of a few seconds (and we could explore how to make that zero, I think that's how the pros do it with like multiple servers)the pros do it with like multiple servers))
  • DIY Algorithms#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-07 04:15:02  + (i think it would be cool if we could pay ai think it would be cool if we could pay a member or two to hack on the instance!! we could take proposals on what ppl would like to see improved that guide what they are working on so we actually can resolve some of the many tiny things littering our [[Mastodon/TODO]] and maybe even one or two big things like finally doing [[DIY Algorithms]] or [[Nested Threads]] or whatnot.</br>[[Grants]] [[Mastodon/Grants]][[Mastodon/Grants]])
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-07 04:15:02  + (i think it would be cool if we could pay ai think it would be cool if we could pay a member or two to hack on the instance!! we could take proposals on what ppl would like to see improved that guide what they are working on so we actually can resolve some of the many tiny things littering our [[Mastodon/TODO]] and maybe even one or two big things like finally doing [[DIY Algorithms]] or [[Nested Threads]] or whatnot.</br>[[Grants]] [[Mastodon/Grants]][[Mastodon/Grants]])
  • Grants#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-07 04:15:02  + (i think it would be cool if we could pay ai think it would be cool if we could pay a member or two to hack on the instance!! we could take proposals on what ppl would like to see improved that guide what they are working on so we actually can resolve some of the many tiny things littering our [[Mastodon/TODO]] and maybe even one or two big things like finally doing [[DIY Algorithms]] or [[Nested Threads]] or whatnot.</br>[[Grants]] [[Mastodon/Grants]][[Mastodon/Grants]])
  • Mastodon/Grants#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-07 04:15:02  + (i think it would be cool if we could pay ai think it would be cool if we could pay a member or two to hack on the instance!! we could take proposals on what ppl would like to see improved that guide what they are working on so we actually can resolve some of the many tiny things littering our [[Mastodon/TODO]] and maybe even one or two big things like finally doing [[DIY Algorithms]] or [[Nested Threads]] or whatnot.</br>[[Grants]] [[Mastodon/Grants]][[Mastodon/Grants]])
  • Mastodon/TODO#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-07 04:15:02  + (i think it would be cool if we could pay ai think it would be cool if we could pay a member or two to hack on the instance!! we could take proposals on what ppl would like to see improved that guide what they are working on so we actually can resolve some of the many tiny things littering our [[Mastodon/TODO]] and maybe even one or two big things like finally doing [[DIY Algorithms]] or [[Nested Threads]] or whatnot.</br>[[Grants]] [[Mastodon/Grants]][[Mastodon/Grants]])
  • Nested Threads#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-07 04:15:02  + (i think it would be cool if we could pay ai think it would be cool if we could pay a member or two to hack on the instance!! we could take proposals on what ppl would like to see improved that guide what they are working on so we actually can resolve some of the many tiny things littering our [[Mastodon/TODO]] and maybe even one or two big things like finally doing [[DIY Algorithms]] or [[Nested Threads]] or whatnot.</br>[[Grants]] [[Mastodon/Grants]][[Mastodon/Grants]])
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-23-07-07 18:51:01  + (- solidarity with the fedi: to survive thi- solidarity with the fedi: to survive this and future attempts at corporate capture, it is important to act together. many instances have already committed to defederation, and even if it is symbolic, symbols are important.</br></br>- being defederated by other instances: we are currently in the good graces of some very protective instances through prior social ties and our promise to be a good actor in the space, these include instances with many leftists, queer people, and others that would likely defederate from us if we were to federate with meta. this would put NMS in a more homogeneous, corporate nice space in the fedi.</br></br>- communication with threads users: some people probably want to communicate with some threads users, and this might cause dual accounts, as you say. defederation would potentially split ties. I will hold my thoughts on this for now since I'm just trying to list the relevant factors.</br></br>what else? listing the concerns, we could then see how each impacts a decision to limit/defederate based on what each decision does. </br></br>I am traveling and AFK until Monday, but I think it would also be good to make a [[Defederation from Meta]] wiki page to keep more organized notes. forgot to tag the previous post.ed notes. forgot to tag the previous post.)
  • Code Review#sneakers-the-rat-23-01-02 22:39:57  + (<@863052667857534996> do y'all have <@863052667857534996> do y'all have anything like this for the pyopensci stuff? like a "make a feature branch off dev, make a pull request back to dev, during a code review, look for xyz" then we will also need stuff like how to do the merge and update the instance [[Hack Merging Policy]] [[Updating Mastodon]] [[Code Review]][[Code Review]])
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-23-01-02 22:39:57  + (<@863052667857534996> do y'all have <@863052667857534996> do y'all have anything like this for the pyopensci stuff? like a "make a feature branch off dev, make a pull request back to dev, during a code review, look for xyz" then we will also need stuff like how to do the merge and update the instance [[Hack Merging Policy]] [[Updating Mastodon]] [[Code Review]][[Code Review]])
  • Hack Merging Policy#sneakers-the-rat-23-01-02 22:39:57  + (<@863052667857534996> do y'all have <@863052667857534996> do y'all have anything like this for the pyopensci stuff? like a "make a feature branch off dev, make a pull request back to dev, during a code review, look for xyz" then we will also need stuff like how to do the merge and update the instance [[Hack Merging Policy]] [[Updating Mastodon]] [[Code Review]][[Code Review]])
  • Updating Mastodon#sneakers-the-rat-23-01-02 22:39:57  + (<@863052667857534996> do y'all have <@863052667857534996> do y'all have anything like this for the pyopensci stuff? like a "make a feature branch off dev, make a pull request back to dev, during a code review, look for xyz" then we will also need stuff like how to do the merge and update the instance [[Hack Merging Policy]] [[Updating Mastodon]] [[Code Review]][[Code Review]])
  • Announcements#mannaz-23-07-07 20:10:07  + (@here [[Announcements]]@here [[Announcements]] hello #neuromatchstodon membies </br>So far [[Jonny]] and [[Manisha]] have been doing most of the admin and moderation work in cooperation with the rest of the instance members. </br></br>We are excited to welcome new members joining our working groups!🎉 🥳 </br></br>This has been a long time coming but #MastoDev extraordinaire [[Lina]] (who contributed to the Exclusive Lists PR that got merged upstream) is joining our [[Tech_WG]] 🙌 </br></br>And the amazing [[El]] (who is one of the organizers of #Maystodon #JoinMastodonDay and #NeuroParty) is joining our [[Social_WG]] 🙌 </br></br>Thank you both for your outstanding contributions ❤️ 🙏th for your outstanding contributions ❤️ 🙏)
  • Discord Messages#mannaz-23-07-07 20:10:07  + (@here [[Announcements]]@here [[Announcements]] hello #neuromatchstodon membies </br>So far <@305044217393053697> and I have been doing most of the admin and moderation work in cooperation with the rest of the instance members. </br></br>We are excited to welcome new members joining our working groups!🎉 🥳 </br></br>This has been a long time coming but our very own #MastoDev <@485848481995423755> (who contributed to the exclusive lists PR that got merged upstream) is joining our <#1049184335514828860> 🙌 </br></br>And the amazing <@961628326005440552> (who is one of the organizers of #Maystodon #JoinMastodonDay and #NeuroParty) is joining the <#1049184264832417823> 🙌 </br></br>Thank you both for your outstanding contributions ❤️ 🙏832417823> 🙌 Thank you both for your outstanding contributions ❤️ 🙏)
  • Ruby#sneakers-the-rat-23-03-18 21:48:09  + (@lina gathering some stuff here: [[Mastodon/Tests]]@lina gathering some stuff here: </br>[[Mastodon/Tests]]</br>[[Mastodon/Tech WG]]</br>[[Exclusive Lists]]</br>[[Ruby Spec]]</br>[[Ruby]]</br>spec for home feed:</br>https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/home_feed_spec.rb</br>for public feed: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/public_feed_spec.rb</br>that gives more examples on how feeds are supposed to be filtered</br>tag feed: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/tag_feed_spec.rb</br>in case we might want to add exclusive tag feeds (I personally do, self interested bc monsterdon lol)</br>account filter (looks like for blocks): https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/account_statuses_filter_spec.rb</br></br>and so on </br></br>the question to me is basically how these things are structured: you have some fabricator steps that set up the conditions for the test, but then you also have these `context` statements that looks like plain English strings to me? like how do those and the `describe` fields map onto the code? like is their testing system so good that you can really just write</br>`it {is_expected.to be_filtered }` and that just works???? or how do you define all those.</br></br>Also u mentioned they are using a separate JavaScript testing framework? [[Jest]] ? that looks like it's configured here: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/jest.config.js</br>and doesn't cover the glitch flavours, just the mastodon folder. it seems like that is for testing the appearance and function of the JS? not sure how it interacts with the ruby tests.</br></br>So for the sake of us learning to write tests here, I don't think we need to aim for full adversarial coverage of the feature, but just get the basics: "when an account is in an exclusive list, their posts dont show up on the home feed." judging from the other tests, it looks like we'll have to also test for boosts from them, but since it's not like a block we don't have to test a bunch of edge cases like interactions.t a bunch of edge cases like interactions.)
  • Exclusive Lists#sneakers-the-rat-23-03-18 21:48:09  + (@lina gathering some stuff here: [[Mastodon/Tests]]@lina gathering some stuff here: </br>[[Mastodon/Tests]]</br>[[Mastodon/Tech WG]]</br>[[Exclusive Lists]]</br>[[Ruby Spec]]</br>[[Ruby]]</br>spec for home feed:</br>https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/home_feed_spec.rb</br>for public feed: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/public_feed_spec.rb</br>that gives more examples on how feeds are supposed to be filtered</br>tag feed: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/tag_feed_spec.rb</br>in case we might want to add exclusive tag feeds (I personally do, self interested bc monsterdon lol)</br>account filter (looks like for blocks): https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/account_statuses_filter_spec.rb</br></br>and so on </br></br>the question to me is basically how these things are structured: you have some fabricator steps that set up the conditions for the test, but then you also have these `context` statements that looks like plain English strings to me? like how do those and the `describe` fields map onto the code? like is their testing system so good that you can really just write</br>`it {is_expected.to be_filtered }` and that just works???? or how do you define all those.</br></br>Also u mentioned they are using a separate JavaScript testing framework? [[Jest]] ? that looks like it's configured here: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/jest.config.js</br>and doesn't cover the glitch flavours, just the mastodon folder. it seems like that is for testing the appearance and function of the JS? not sure how it interacts with the ruby tests.</br></br>So for the sake of us learning to write tests here, I don't think we need to aim for full adversarial coverage of the feature, but just get the basics: "when an account is in an exclusive list, their posts dont show up on the home feed." judging from the other tests, it looks like we'll have to also test for boosts from them, but since it's not like a block we don't have to test a bunch of edge cases like interactions.t a bunch of edge cases like interactions.)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-23-03-18 21:48:09  + (@lina gathering some stuff here: [[Mastodon/Tests]]@lina gathering some stuff here: </br>[[Mastodon/Tests]]</br>[[Mastodon/Tech WG]]</br>[[Exclusive Lists]]</br>[[Ruby Spec]]</br>[[Ruby]]</br>spec for home feed:</br>https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/home_feed_spec.rb</br>for public feed: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/public_feed_spec.rb</br>that gives more examples on how feeds are supposed to be filtered</br>tag feed: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/tag_feed_spec.rb</br>in case we might want to add exclusive tag feeds (I personally do, self interested bc monsterdon lol)</br>account filter (looks like for blocks): https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/account_statuses_filter_spec.rb</br></br>and so on </br></br>the question to me is basically how these things are structured: you have some fabricator steps that set up the conditions for the test, but then you also have these `context` statements that looks like plain English strings to me? like how do those and the `describe` fields map onto the code? like is their testing system so good that you can really just write</br>`it {is_expected.to be_filtered }` and that just works???? or how do you define all those.</br></br>Also u mentioned they are using a separate JavaScript testing framework? [[Jest]] ? that looks like it's configured here: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/jest.config.js</br>and doesn't cover the glitch flavours, just the mastodon folder. it seems like that is for testing the appearance and function of the JS? not sure how it interacts with the ruby tests.</br></br>So for the sake of us learning to write tests here, I don't think we need to aim for full adversarial coverage of the feature, but just get the basics: "when an account is in an exclusive list, their posts dont show up on the home feed." judging from the other tests, it looks like we'll have to also test for boosts from them, but since it's not like a block we don't have to test a bunch of edge cases like interactions.t a bunch of edge cases like interactions.)
  • Mastodon/Tests#sneakers-the-rat-23-03-18 21:48:09  + (@lina gathering some stuff here: [[Mastodon/Tests]]@lina gathering some stuff here: </br>[[Mastodon/Tests]]</br>[[Mastodon/Tech WG]]</br>[[Exclusive Lists]]</br>[[Ruby Spec]]</br>[[Ruby]]</br>spec for home feed:</br>https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/home_feed_spec.rb</br>for public feed: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/public_feed_spec.rb</br>that gives more examples on how feeds are supposed to be filtered</br>tag feed: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/tag_feed_spec.rb</br>in case we might want to add exclusive tag feeds (I personally do, self interested bc monsterdon lol)</br>account filter (looks like for blocks): https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/account_statuses_filter_spec.rb</br></br>and so on </br></br>the question to me is basically how these things are structured: you have some fabricator steps that set up the conditions for the test, but then you also have these `context` statements that looks like plain English strings to me? like how do those and the `describe` fields map onto the code? like is their testing system so good that you can really just write</br>`it {is_expected.to be_filtered }` and that just works???? or how do you define all those.</br></br>Also u mentioned they are using a separate JavaScript testing framework? [[Jest]] ? that looks like it's configured here: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/jest.config.js</br>and doesn't cover the glitch flavours, just the mastodon folder. it seems like that is for testing the appearance and function of the JS? not sure how it interacts with the ruby tests.</br></br>So for the sake of us learning to write tests here, I don't think we need to aim for full adversarial coverage of the feature, but just get the basics: "when an account is in an exclusive list, their posts dont show up on the home feed." judging from the other tests, it looks like we'll have to also test for boosts from them, but since it's not like a block we don't have to test a bunch of edge cases like interactions.t a bunch of edge cases like interactions.)
  • Jest#sneakers-the-rat-23-03-18 21:48:09  + (@lina gathering some stuff here: [[Mastodon/Tests]]@lina gathering some stuff here: </br>[[Mastodon/Tests]]</br>[[Mastodon/Tech WG]]</br>[[Exclusive Lists]]</br>[[Ruby Spec]]</br>[[Ruby]]</br>spec for home feed:</br>https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/home_feed_spec.rb</br>for public feed: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/public_feed_spec.rb</br>that gives more examples on how feeds are supposed to be filtered</br>tag feed: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/tag_feed_spec.rb</br>in case we might want to add exclusive tag feeds (I personally do, self interested bc monsterdon lol)</br>account filter (looks like for blocks): https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/account_statuses_filter_spec.rb</br></br>and so on </br></br>the question to me is basically how these things are structured: you have some fabricator steps that set up the conditions for the test, but then you also have these `context` statements that looks like plain English strings to me? like how do those and the `describe` fields map onto the code? like is their testing system so good that you can really just write</br>`it {is_expected.to be_filtered }` and that just works???? or how do you define all those.</br></br>Also u mentioned they are using a separate JavaScript testing framework? [[Jest]] ? that looks like it's configured here: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/jest.config.js</br>and doesn't cover the glitch flavours, just the mastodon folder. it seems like that is for testing the appearance and function of the JS? not sure how it interacts with the ruby tests.</br></br>So for the sake of us learning to write tests here, I don't think we need to aim for full adversarial coverage of the feature, but just get the basics: "when an account is in an exclusive list, their posts dont show up on the home feed." judging from the other tests, it looks like we'll have to also test for boosts from them, but since it's not like a block we don't have to test a bunch of edge cases like interactions.t a bunch of edge cases like interactions.)
  • Ruby Spec#sneakers-the-rat-23-03-18 21:48:09  + (@lina gathering some stuff here: [[Mastodon/Tests]]@lina gathering some stuff here: </br>[[Mastodon/Tests]]</br>[[Mastodon/Tech WG]]</br>[[Exclusive Lists]]</br>[[Ruby Spec]]</br>[[Ruby]]</br>spec for home feed:</br>https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/home_feed_spec.rb</br>for public feed: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/public_feed_spec.rb</br>that gives more examples on how feeds are supposed to be filtered</br>tag feed: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/tag_feed_spec.rb</br>in case we might want to add exclusive tag feeds (I personally do, self interested bc monsterdon lol)</br>account filter (looks like for blocks): https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/spec/models/account_statuses_filter_spec.rb</br></br>and so on </br></br>the question to me is basically how these things are structured: you have some fabricator steps that set up the conditions for the test, but then you also have these `context` statements that looks like plain English strings to me? like how do those and the `describe` fields map onto the code? like is their testing system so good that you can really just write</br>`it {is_expected.to be_filtered }` and that just works???? or how do you define all those.</br></br>Also u mentioned they are using a separate JavaScript testing framework? [[Jest]] ? that looks like it's configured here: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/jest.config.js</br>and doesn't cover the glitch flavours, just the mastodon folder. it seems like that is for testing the appearance and function of the JS? not sure how it interacts with the ruby tests.</br></br>So for the sake of us learning to write tests here, I don't think we need to aim for full adversarial coverage of the feature, but just get the basics: "when an account is in an exclusive list, their posts dont show up on the home feed." judging from the other tests, it looks like we'll have to also test for boosts from them, but since it's not like a block we don't have to test a bunch of edge cases like interactions.t a bunch of edge cases like interactions.)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-02 03:11:06  + (Ah yes, this is a [[Consensus]]Ah yes, this is a [[Consensus]] thing. I just updated the wiki page to explain a bit better: https://wiki.neuromatch.io/Mastodon/Governance#Voting</br>Yes, you can think of it analogously to a veto. Consensus refers both to making decisions that accommodate the needs of all members as well as consent - you should not be able to be coerced into consent by a bare majority of people. In more intimate consensus processes, a single person might be able to block a proposal. That becomes untenable in larger groups for sort of obvious reasons, hence the design of this governance system to have different proportional thresholds for different types of proposals, as well as division of decisionmaking power between working groups and the general membership. </br></br>A block means something different than voting in a few ways, including that blocks should be rare: consensus sort of inverts the decisionmaking process, where care should be taken to discuss with the membership and refine a proposal before, rather than after making the proposal - so in a majoritarian system one might make a proposal and make an argument in favor, people discuss in the comments and then make up their minds there. The purpose of requiring discussion beforehand is to make more space for everyone to craft the proposal in the first place, register concerns, etc. So if people are blocking a proposal, that is a sign that the process has failed (as opposed to in a majoritarian system that the proposal has failed). </br></br>Blocking also typically enjoins the person blocking to help remedy the reason for their block: if a proposal is being made in good faith, we assume that it is meeting some unmet need by the proposer/other members. If someone blocks a proposal, that will mean that it might cause them or the organization harm, but those unmet needs still remain - so it's basically like conflict res at that point. Ofc there are exceptions like not making marginalized ppl do additional labor, etc.marginalized ppl do additional labor, etc.)
  • Consensus#sneakers-the-rat-23-02-02 03:11:06  + (Ah yes, this is a [[Consensus]]Ah yes, this is a [[Consensus]] thing. I just updated the wiki page to explain a bit better: https://wiki.neuromatch.io/Mastodon/Governance#Voting</br>Yes, you can think of it analogously to a veto. Consensus refers both to making decisions that accommodate the needs of all members as well as consent - you should not be able to be coerced into consent by a bare majority of people. In more intimate consensus processes, a single person might be able to block a proposal. That becomes untenable in larger groups for sort of obvious reasons, hence the design of this governance system to have different proportional thresholds for different types of proposals, as well as division of decisionmaking power between working groups and the general membership. </br></br>A block means something different than voting in a few ways, including that blocks should be rare: consensus sort of inverts the decisionmaking process, where care should be taken to discuss with the membership and refine a proposal before, rather than after making the proposal - so in a majoritarian system one might make a proposal and make an argument in favor, people discuss in the comments and then make up their minds there. The purpose of requiring discussion beforehand is to make more space for everyone to craft the proposal in the first place, register concerns, etc. So if people are blocking a proposal, that is a sign that the process has failed (as opposed to in a majoritarian system that the proposal has failed). </br></br>Blocking also typically enjoins the person blocking to help remedy the reason for their block: if a proposal is being made in good faith, we assume that it is meeting some unmet need by the proposer/other members. If someone blocks a proposal, that will mean that it might cause them or the organization harm, but those unmet needs still remain - so it's basically like conflict res at that point. Ofc there are exceptions like not making marginalized ppl do additional labor, etc.marginalized ppl do additional labor, etc.)
  • Mastodon/Mathjax#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-12 08:37:18  + (Aight i'm totally flummoxed about how to gAight i'm totally flummoxed about how to get [[Mastodon/Mathjax#Stumpted]] to load. it <really really> wants you to use the <script> tag loading method, which i would rather not do since that makes it way less portable or else requires a call-out to an external CDN, but I can't get the startup functions to trigger programmatically, and i've tried all the various things in their docs as well as some other stuff that isn't. I am tempted to just rewrite the mathstodon stuff using a react component that i was able to find but idk <@451520217139511306> u know anything else about this?<@451520217139511306> u know anything else about this?)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-12 08:37:18  + (Aight i'm totally flummoxed about how to gAight i'm totally flummoxed about how to get [[Mastodon/Mathjax#Stumpted]] to load. it <really really> wants you to use the <script> tag loading method, which i would rather not do since that makes it way less portable or else requires a call-out to an external CDN, but I can't get the startup functions to trigger programmatically, and i've tried all the various things in their docs as well as some other stuff that isn't. I am tempted to just rewrite the mathstodon stuff using a react component that i was able to find but idk <@451520217139511306> u know anything else about this?<@451520217139511306> u know anything else about this?)
  • TODO#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-20 05:20:06  + (Also that reminds me that I did get the announcement notif but the interface opened starting with the first announcement not the most recent one so [[TODO]])
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-24-01-20 05:20:06  + (Also that reminds me that I did get the announcement notif but the interface opened starting with the first announcement not the most recent one so [[TODO]])
  • Unattended Upgrades#sneakers.the.rat-23-09-21 21:37:59  + (Btw I noticed we don't have [[Unattended Upgrades]]Btw I noticed we don't have [[Unattended Upgrades]] turned on to automatically keep system-level packages up to date. I usually do that with servers I manage because i have been told by security ppl that keeping up to date is like most of what matters with day-to-say security probs, but i mean it seems like it could uh accidentally break a package one day and kill the instance, so idk if there's a reason to not do that but thought i'd ask reason to not do that but thought i'd ask)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-23-09-21 21:37:59  + (Btw I noticed we don't have [[Unattended Upgrades]]Btw I noticed we don't have [[Unattended Upgrades]] turned on to automatically keep system-level packages up to date. I usually do that with servers I manage because i have been told by security ppl that keeping up to date is like most of what matters with day-to-say security probs, but i mean it seems like it could uh accidentally break a package one day and kill the instance, so idk if there's a reason to not do that but thought i'd ask reason to not do that but thought i'd ask)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-17 00:07:49  + (For the moment, until we decide on a diffeFor the moment, until we decide on a different model, neuromatch bears the costs of the instance. Though we trust neuromatch to not abuse that power, one question we should answer as a community is whether we want to move to a fully cooperative model where the members of the instance support its costs so it is truly member-owned and operated. That would likely look like some sliding scale model where members are encouraged to pay what they can, a rough guideline based on nothing but vibes might be: </br>- $0/mo for students/people making <$50k annually</br>- $1/mo for postdocs/people making <$75k annually</br>- $5/mo for PIs/people making >$75k annually</br>though this would be something we would determine based on how many members we have and how much the instance costs to run. If we were to do this, then we would use opencollective to make our finances transparent. </br></br>We could also do a hybrid model where neuromatch kicks in some defined contribution and the members donate the rest, or if we establish a financial working group we could collectively apply for grants with neuromatch as a fiscal sponsor.</br></br>Another benefit is that by having some financial surplus we would be able to pay stipends to people who volunteer for mod duty/being on call for tech emergencies.</br></br>In the meantime though, mostly so the <#1049184335514828860> knows what it's working with: what kind of costs is neuromatch willing to bear? eg. upgrading to a 16GB ram node with 8 dedicated CPUs would be $120/month but would probably be as much scale as we need for the indefinite future. Currently we are going to upgrade to an 8GB ram node at $60/month, which is already $720 annually (just for the instance, we are also running another node that will host the wiki and loomio)</br><@215274946560131074> </br>[[Mastodon/Finances]][[Mastodon/Finances]])
  • Mastodon/Finances#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-17 00:07:49  + (For the moment, until we decide on a diffeFor the moment, until we decide on a different model, neuromatch bears the costs of the instance. Though we trust neuromatch to not abuse that power, one question we should answer as a community is whether we want to move to a fully cooperative model where the members of the instance support its costs so it is truly member-owned and operated. That would likely look like some sliding scale model where members are encouraged to pay what they can, a rough guideline based on nothing but vibes might be: </br>- $0/mo for students/people making <$50k annually</br>- $1/mo for postdocs/people making <$75k annually</br>- $5/mo for PIs/people making >$75k annually</br>though this would be something we would determine based on how many members we have and how much the instance costs to run. If we were to do this, then we would use opencollective to make our finances transparent. </br></br>We could also do a hybrid model where neuromatch kicks in some defined contribution and the members donate the rest, or if we establish a financial working group we could collectively apply for grants with neuromatch as a fiscal sponsor.</br></br>Another benefit is that by having some financial surplus we would be able to pay stipends to people who volunteer for mod duty/being on call for tech emergencies.</br></br>In the meantime though, mostly so the <#1049184335514828860> knows what it's working with: what kind of costs is neuromatch willing to bear? eg. upgrading to a 16GB ram node with 8 dedicated CPUs would be $120/month but would probably be as much scale as we need for the indefinite future. Currently we are going to upgrade to an 8GB ram node at $60/month, which is already $720 annually (just for the instance, we are also running another node that will host the wiki and loomio)</br><@215274946560131074> </br>[[Mastodon/Finances]][[Mastodon/Finances]])
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-23-03-10 07:10:00  + (I just had a good idea I think: [[Mastodon/Hacks#Ideas]]I just had a good idea I think:</br>[[Mastodon/Hacks#Ideas]] [[Zenodo Social Reading]]</br>https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/109997725222638244</br></br>> ok you know what would actually rock: a #Zenodo plugin where you could sync a collection to an #ActivityPub outbox, and do social public highlighting that way - share a set of papers under a topic for ppl to browse, but also share your annotations and then be able to show your friends annotations over the papers you're reading if u want to</br>#MastoHacks #MastoDevre reading if u want to #MastoHacks #MastoDev)
  • Zenodo Social Reading#sneakers-the-rat-23-03-10 07:10:00  + (I just had a good idea I think: [[Mastodon/Hacks#Ideas]]I just had a good idea I think:</br>[[Mastodon/Hacks#Ideas]] [[Zenodo Social Reading]]</br>https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/109997725222638244</br></br>> ok you know what would actually rock: a #Zenodo plugin where you could sync a collection to an #ActivityPub outbox, and do social public highlighting that way - share a set of papers under a topic for ppl to browse, but also share your annotations and then be able to show your friends annotations over the papers you're reading if u want to</br>#MastoHacks #MastoDevre reading if u want to #MastoHacks #MastoDev)
  • Mastodon/Hacks#sneakers-the-rat-23-03-10 07:10:00  + (I just had a good idea I think: [[Mastodon/Hacks#Ideas]]I just had a good idea I think:</br>[[Mastodon/Hacks#Ideas]] [[Zenodo Social Reading]]</br>https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/109997725222638244</br></br>> ok you know what would actually rock: a #Zenodo plugin where you could sync a collection to an #ActivityPub outbox, and do social public highlighting that way - share a set of papers under a topic for ppl to browse, but also share your annotations and then be able to show your friends annotations over the papers you're reading if u want to</br>#MastoHacks #MastoDevre reading if u want to #MastoHacks #MastoDev)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-23-09-27 23:54:40  + (I wanted to check in before I invited someI wanted to check in before I invited someone(s) that is not a neuromatch.social member to the discord - we already have a few beloved [[Honorary Members]] but I dont think we have any explicit norm here. Does anyone have any objection to this? </br></br>The main reason to use discord is to be able to coordinate in small groups in real time in a way masto doesn't really work for, and nothing in public channels as far as I can tell is private, so it makes sense to me for members to be able to invite ppl they vouch for? If honorary members cause trouble (which I doubt they would) then we could address that when/if it happens, it seems like prevailing social norms of being responsible for someone u bring into a space mostly take care of that yno.</br></br>If I dont hear anything in a day or so ill invite them!r anything in a day or so ill invite them!)
  • Honorary Members#sneakers.the.rat-23-09-27 23:54:40  + (I wanted to check in before I invited someI wanted to check in before I invited someone(s) that is not a neuromatch.social member to the discord - we already have a few beloved [[Honorary Members]] but I dont think we have any explicit norm here. Does anyone have any objection to this? </br></br>The main reason to use discord is to be able to coordinate in small groups in real time in a way masto doesn't really work for, and nothing in public channels as far as I can tell is private, so it makes sense to me for members to be able to invite ppl they vouch for? If honorary members cause trouble (which I doubt they would) then we could address that when/if it happens, it seems like prevailing social norms of being responsible for someone u bring into a space mostly take care of that yno.</br></br>If I dont hear anything in a day or so ill invite them!r anything in a day or so ill invite them!)
  • Tech WG/Ops Diary#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-25 01:59:05  + (OK [[Tech WG/Ops Diary#22-12-24]]OK</br>[[Tech WG/Ops Diary#22-12-24]] going to pull in a few upgrades:</br>https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/pull/7</br>* Mathjax</br>* Larger Post Previews</br>* Default false notifications for new follows</br>* Autofollow accounts</br></br>And also pulling in updates from upstream glitch-soc, which in my test run means that we have to upgrade node from 14 to 16that we have to upgrade node from 14 to 16)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-25 01:59:05  + (OK [[Tech WG/Ops Diary#22-12-24]]OK</br>[[Tech WG/Ops Diary#22-12-24]] going to pull in a few upgrades:</br>https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/pull/7</br>* Mathjax</br>* Larger Post Previews</br>* Default false notifications for new follows</br>* Autofollow accounts</br></br>And also pulling in updates from upstream glitch-soc, which in my test run means that we have to upgrade node from 14 to 16that we have to upgrade node from 14 to 16)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-23-12-05 06:58:02  + (OK <@318247805124870145> i'm doing aOK <@318247805124870145> i'm doing a little wiki gardening rn and here i'll narrate a little of what i'm doing as i do it to give you a sense of what that looks like:</br></br>first i am reading this and wondering how i could offer part of this to you, and with this set of prompts and with ur previous comments about 'where do i even start with this thing' which are extremely justified i want to make a 'how to get started with masto as software' page, so I go to where we have previously put such things on the Tech WG page (https://wiki.neuromatch.social/Tech_WG ) and add a link there to a new [[Intro To Mastohacking]] page ( https://wiki.neuromatch.social/Intro_To_Mastohacking ) since i figure "intro to mastodon" is too much like our general getting started on fedi pages. idk we can always change it later.</br></br>So then i do a search for "docs" to see where else we might have written stuff like this and lo and behold there's also a page for that, so i add a link from there too: https://wiki.neuromatch.social/Mastodon/Docs</br></br>then i start my new page by adding categories and backlinks. Don't worry about the syntax for right now, but what i'm doing here is making this page findable in a few different ways - by navigating from related pages, formally through the semantic relationship `Part Of`, and then also via the category system (which we can also query to eg. display a list of all pages in the "hacking" and "guide" categories if we want to make some automatic index, but i digress).</br></br>nothing on the page yet but that? fuck it, save page. we can keep saving as we update, no need to be shy on wiki</br></br>(sorry for notifs el i'm going to split this up into a few messages so i can intersperse images)into a few messages so i can intersperse images))
  • Mastodon and Neuromatch#sneakers-the-rat-23-04-01 22:32:47  + (QUESTION isn't [[NMA]]QUESTION isn't [[NMA]] coming up? and maybe [[NMC]] at some point???? how can the instance support that????? can we make some cool pages for people to share their code or whatever, index the talks in a conference, etc???? I have posted a few ideas before in the neuromatch slack but wanted to pose this generally to the instance and see if we can yno use that as a motivating reason to do some masto hacking</br>tagging the neuromatch ppl I know are on the discord <@540104559079456770> <@1050459047582781480> <@215274946560131074> <@651480296415297553> and who else sorry I don't have a list</br>[[Mastodon and Neuromatch]]</br>[[Neuromatch and Mastodon]] (idk lol I'll just redirect one page to another)</br>[[Infrastructure]][[Infrastructure]])
  • Infrastructure#sneakers-the-rat-23-04-01 22:32:47  + (QUESTION isn't [[NMA]]QUESTION isn't [[NMA]] coming up? and maybe [[NMC]] at some point???? how can the instance support that????? can we make some cool pages for people to share their code or whatever, index the talks in a conference, etc???? I have posted a few ideas before in the neuromatch slack but wanted to pose this generally to the instance and see if we can yno use that as a motivating reason to do some masto hacking</br>tagging the neuromatch ppl I know are on the discord <@540104559079456770> <@1050459047582781480> <@215274946560131074> <@651480296415297553> and who else sorry I don't have a list</br>[[Mastodon and Neuromatch]]</br>[[Neuromatch and Mastodon]] (idk lol I'll just redirect one page to another)</br>[[Infrastructure]][[Infrastructure]])
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-23-04-01 22:32:47  + (QUESTION isn't [[NMA]]QUESTION isn't [[NMA]] coming up? and maybe [[NMC]] at some point???? how can the instance support that????? can we make some cool pages for people to share their code or whatever, index the talks in a conference, etc???? I have posted a few ideas before in the neuromatch slack but wanted to pose this generally to the instance and see if we can yno use that as a motivating reason to do some masto hacking</br>tagging the neuromatch ppl I know are on the discord <@540104559079456770> <@1050459047582781480> <@215274946560131074> <@651480296415297553> and who else sorry I don't have a list</br>[[Mastodon and Neuromatch]]</br>[[Neuromatch and Mastodon]] (idk lol I'll just redirect one page to another)</br>[[Infrastructure]][[Infrastructure]])
  • Neuromatch and Mastodon#sneakers-the-rat-23-04-01 22:32:47  + (QUESTION isn't [[NMA]]QUESTION isn't [[NMA]] coming up? and maybe [[NMC]] at some point???? how can the instance support that????? can we make some cool pages for people to share their code or whatever, index the talks in a conference, etc???? I have posted a few ideas before in the neuromatch slack but wanted to pose this generally to the instance and see if we can yno use that as a motivating reason to do some masto hacking</br>tagging the neuromatch ppl I know are on the discord <@540104559079456770> <@1050459047582781480> <@215274946560131074> <@651480296415297553> and who else sorry I don't have a list</br>[[Mastodon and Neuromatch]]</br>[[Neuromatch and Mastodon]] (idk lol I'll just redirect one page to another)</br>[[Infrastructure]][[Infrastructure]])
  • NMA#sneakers-the-rat-23-04-01 22:32:47  + (QUESTION isn't [[NMA]]QUESTION isn't [[NMA]] coming up? and maybe [[NMC]] at some point???? how can the instance support that????? can we make some cool pages for people to share their code or whatever, index the talks in a conference, etc???? I have posted a few ideas before in the neuromatch slack but wanted to pose this generally to the instance and see if we can yno use that as a motivating reason to do some masto hacking</br>tagging the neuromatch ppl I know are on the discord <@540104559079456770> <@1050459047582781480> <@215274946560131074> <@651480296415297553> and who else sorry I don't have a list</br>[[Mastodon and Neuromatch]]</br>[[Neuromatch and Mastodon]] (idk lol I'll just redirect one page to another)</br>[[Infrastructure]][[Infrastructure]])
  • NMC#sneakers-the-rat-23-04-01 22:32:47  + (QUESTION isn't [[NMA]]QUESTION isn't [[NMA]] coming up? and maybe [[NMC]] at some point???? how can the instance support that????? can we make some cool pages for people to share their code or whatever, index the talks in a conference, etc???? I have posted a few ideas before in the neuromatch slack but wanted to pose this generally to the instance and see if we can yno use that as a motivating reason to do some masto hacking</br>tagging the neuromatch ppl I know are on the discord <@540104559079456770> <@1050459047582781480> <@215274946560131074> <@651480296415297553> and who else sorry I don't have a list</br>[[Mastodon and Neuromatch]]</br>[[Neuromatch and Mastodon]] (idk lol I'll just redirect one page to another)</br>[[Infrastructure]][[Infrastructure]])
  • Wiki/TODO#mstimberg-22-12-09 20:16:00  + (Re [[Wiki/TODO#Onboarding]]: I migrated earlier today and took some notes, happy to add them to the wiki – I'd need someone to approve my account (`mstimberg`), though 😊)
  • Discord Messages#mstimberg-22-12-09 20:16:00  + (Re [[Wiki/TODO#Onboarding]]: I migrated earlier today and took some notes, happy to add them to the wiki – I'd need someone to approve my account (`mstimberg`), though 😊)
  • Rack Attack#sneakers-the-rat-23-04-06 23:26:09  + (So [[Masto Docs]]So [[Masto Docs]] [[Rate Limiting]] is controlled by [[Rack Attack]]</br>- https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/config/initializers/rack_attack.rb</br>- logging: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/config/initializers/rack_attack_logging.rb</br>- docs: https://github.com/rack/rack-attack#throttling</br></br>The throttling rules differentiate between authenticated and unauthenticated API requests, so I would want to raise the authenticated ones. Unfortunately the logging does not actually tell me what *kind* of throttle is being hit (eg. the authenticated api vs token api vs paging api, etc.) and the throttling rules definitely overlap with one another... so I'm going to make that change first - log the kind of throttle that is hit, and then come back later and actually adjust valuescome back later and actually adjust values)
  • Masto Docs#sneakers-the-rat-23-04-06 23:26:09  + (So [[Masto Docs]]So [[Masto Docs]] [[Rate Limiting]] is controlled by [[Rack Attack]]</br>- https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/config/initializers/rack_attack.rb</br>- logging: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/config/initializers/rack_attack_logging.rb</br>- docs: https://github.com/rack/rack-attack#throttling</br></br>The throttling rules differentiate between authenticated and unauthenticated API requests, so I would want to raise the authenticated ones. Unfortunately the logging does not actually tell me what *kind* of throttle is being hit (eg. the authenticated api vs token api vs paging api, etc.) and the throttling rules definitely overlap with one another... so I'm going to make that change first - log the kind of throttle that is hit, and then come back later and actually adjust valuescome back later and actually adjust values)
  • Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-23-04-06 23:26:09  + (So [[Masto Docs]]So [[Masto Docs]] [[Rate Limiting]] is controlled by [[Rack Attack]]</br>- https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/config/initializers/rack_attack.rb</br>- logging: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/config/initializers/rack_attack_logging.rb</br>- docs: https://github.com/rack/rack-attack#throttling</br></br>The throttling rules differentiate between authenticated and unauthenticated API requests, so I would want to raise the authenticated ones. Unfortunately the logging does not actually tell me what *kind* of throttle is being hit (eg. the authenticated api vs token api vs paging api, etc.) and the throttling rules definitely overlap with one another... so I'm going to make that change first - log the kind of throttle that is hit, and then come back later and actually adjust valuescome back later and actually adjust values)
  • Rate Limiting#sneakers-the-rat-23-04-06 23:26:09  + (So [[Masto Docs]]So [[Masto Docs]] [[Rate Limiting]] is controlled by [[Rack Attack]]</br>- https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/config/initializers/rack_attack.rb</br>- logging: https://github.com/NeuromatchAcademy/mastodon/blob/main/config/initializers/rack_attack_logging.rb</br>- docs: https://github.com/rack/rack-attack#throttling</br></br>The throttling rules differentiate between authenticated and unauthenticated API requests, so I would want to raise the authenticated ones. Unfortunately the logging does not actually tell me what *kind* of throttle is being hit (eg. the authenticated api vs token api vs paging api, etc.) and the throttling rules definitely overlap with one another... so I'm going to make that change first - log the kind of throttle that is hit, and then come back later and actually adjust valuescome back later and actually adjust values)
  • TODO#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-09 11:52:48  + (So anyway [[TODO]] Document the [[WikiBot]])
  • Slugified URLs#sneakers.the.rat-23-10-06 21:45:39  + (So idle thought, i saw someone whose instSo idle thought, i saw someone whose instance had [[Slugified URLs]] for posts, ( eg. https://neuromatch.social/@Jonny /my-post-title )</br>And it looks like it would be pretty easy to do...</br>- add a `slug` db column in the statuses table</br>- add a route using `slug` https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/blob/3262d1f1b62a984343f0f6c67c1d18921daabb0a/config/routes.rb#L130</br>- add a field to the status composer component to optionally add a slug, which would need to validate for correct formatting and uniqueness (eg. Show red outline with message when slug is already used, disallow spaces and other non URI chars)</br>- add API endpoint to check if slug exists</br>- add button in "share" dropdown to copy slugified link</br>- optionally: provide an auto-slug option that slugifies the first n unique characters in a post, or parses a leading # header</br></br>That would be for adding them as an additional ui thing, rather than changing the representation of the AP objects/etc. ID URL would remain canonical, slug would be useful for sharing, and also if we want to allow posts to behave more like pages (eg. Set custom page CSS for an `Article` type vs the usual `Note` ) for a future rich text editor hack that makes masto both micro and macro blog</br></br>[[Mastodon/Hacks]][[Mastodon/Hacks]])
  • Discord Messages#sneakers.the.rat-23-10-06 21:45:39  + (So idle thought, i saw someone whose instSo idle thought, i saw someone whose instance had [[Slugified URLs]] for posts, ( eg. https://neuromatch.social/@Jonny /my-post-title )</br>And it looks like it would be pretty easy to do...</br>- add a `slug` db column in the statuses table</br>- add a route using `slug` https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/blob/3262d1f1b62a984343f0f6c67c1d18921daabb0a/config/routes.rb#L130</br>- add a field to the status composer component to optionally add a slug, which would need to validate for correct formatting and uniqueness (eg. Show red outline with message when slug is already used, disallow spaces and other non URI chars)</br>- add API endpoint to check if slug exists</br>- add button in "share" dropdown to copy slugified link</br>- optionally: provide an auto-slug option that slugifies the first n unique characters in a post, or parses a leading # header</br></br>That would be for adding them as an additional ui thing, rather than changing the representation of the AP objects/etc. ID URL would remain canonical, slug would be useful for sharing, and also if we want to allow posts to behave more like pages (eg. Set custom page CSS for an `Article` type vs the usual `Note` ) for a future rich text editor hack that makes masto both micro and macro blog</br></br>[[Mastodon/Hacks]][[Mastodon/Hacks]])
  • Mastodon/Hacks#sneakers.the.rat-23-10-06 21:45:39  + (So idle thought, i saw someone whose instSo idle thought, i saw someone whose instance had [[Slugified URLs]] for posts, ( eg. https://neuromatch.social/@Jonny /my-post-title )</br>And it looks like it would be pretty easy to do...</br>- add a `slug` db column in the statuses table</br>- add a route using `slug` https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/blob/3262d1f1b62a984343f0f6c67c1d18921daabb0a/config/routes.rb#L130</br>- add a field to the status composer component to optionally add a slug, which would need to validate for correct formatting and uniqueness (eg. Show red outline with message when slug is already used, disallow spaces and other non URI chars)</br>- add API endpoint to check if slug exists</br>- add button in "share" dropdown to copy slugified link</br>- optionally: provide an auto-slug option that slugifies the first n unique characters in a post, or parses a leading # header</br></br>That would be for adding them as an additional ui thing, rather than changing the representation of the AP objects/etc. ID URL would remain canonical, slug would be useful for sharing, and also if we want to allow posts to behave more like pages (eg. Set custom page CSS for an `Article` type vs the usual `Note` ) for a future rich text editor hack that makes masto both micro and macro blog</br></br>[[Mastodon/Hacks]][[Mastodon/Hacks]])